![fnaf song it fnaf song it](https://c-cl.cdn.smule.com/rs-s-sf-4/sing_google/performance/cover/50/61/a6d56591-385c-4dfd-a2f8-4d1496c54758.jpg)
I didn't do the correlations, but I did decide to write about them, and chose to treat them with certain respect. Well, the "you" being charged here isn't me. I see nothing in this article about its explanatory power." "Congratulations," says reader Tom Benton, "You plotted some data points and then ran a regression. Others of you think the data is rigged, and animals or plants that don't fit the pattern have been spliced out, or that the size/mortality correlation is too vague to be trusted. Many of you admit that size may correlate with lifespan in theory, but in the real world, animals get crushed, eaten, get diseases and size doesn't say anything about that. A bunch of you, mostly scientists, almost always biologists, have suggested that Geoffrey West's ideas, or my version of his ideas, are so simply stated, or based on such flimsy or fudged evidence, that the relationship between size and mortality is not to be trusted.
![fnaf song it fnaf song it](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ejy0NtsicxY/mqdefault.jpg)
I've been a little surprised by some of the comments posted down below. Notice how plants, big and small fall along the same quarter-power line? Here it is, from a paper by Marba, Duarte and Agusti, cited in my blog post. As for the peculiar quarter power scaling differences, that rule emerges from the data when you plot the different lifespans of animals or plants on a graph. Both wear out after a billion and a half beats, but the elephant does it more slowly. That's why an elephant cell can beat at a slower rate than the rattatat-tat of a mouse cell. The cells in an elephant do more work in a minute than the cells of a mouse. So Geoffrey West and his colleagues found that nature gives larger creatures a gift: more efficient cells. In any big creature, animal or plant, there are so many more pathways, moving parts, so much more work to do, the big guys could wear out very quickly. An elephant has trillions more cells than a shrew, and all those cells have to connect and communicate to keep the animal going. But to summarize, nature goes easy on larger creatures so they don't wear out too quickly. If you're interested in quarter power scaling, you can check out " Of Mice and Elephants: A Matter of Scale," by George Johnson or go back to an earlier blog post I wrote here. Modern humans have managed, because of medicines and hygiene, to become an exception, but 50,000 years ago, we were probably part of the pattern. Every individual is subject to accident, caprice, luck. We work tight together with every artist and make sure his work is getting featured! -All money made with our ads will be reinvested in Animations.Of course these rules do not tell any particular bee or dog or person when they are going to die. Let's have an AWESOME time to together on the channel! ━► -We do NOT steal animations. This should be a happy place! -Disrespectful comments will get you blocked. Forum : Facebook : goo.gl/Uzvcb9 Twitter: goo.gl/HBJbwk Google+ : goo.gl/yW1Ims Website : ♫MUSIC : csKamcord : ━► -Respect each other in the comments. MUSIC FIVE NIGHTS AT FREDDY'S 3 SONG (It's Time To Die) Music Video - DAGames ━► Animator : csSong by: csJoin the Road to 1 Million Subs ━► bit.ly/1gYrQpJ ►Fnaf Shirts: Shirt Store : /?~7voa Cheap Games : bit.ly/1Cd4Ttr ━► Steam : /groups/Offi.